Showing posts with label remake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label remake. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 March 2018

Tomb Raider (2018)


PLEASANTLY SURPRISED. Honestly. Lara Croft is back, Alicia Vikander stars as daughter of missing adventurer who ends up on the island where he had disappeared. 

Video game adaptations have a certain stigma, of course they do. There's some great games with some great stories but they're playable. The characters are empty so you can play them. This is why if you think about Jolie's performance, chances are you remember her look (and her accent) but not so much who the character is. Tomb Raider (2018) does surprisingly well in making her an actual person and not just a pair of pointy boobs running around in a forest. Vikander is great, as expected, the Swedish actress already has one Oscar under her belt. Though more of an action role than she has played before she was believably strong, great physique and showed determination. 

The action is good if you include chase scenes, if you take them out then there's not really any action left. There's 3 main chase scenes, in London, in Japan and in the jungle on the island. Different terrain different reasoning but all well shot and paced. Though the film itself was still quite long. The cinematography was decent though it did have the luxury of having some great looking locations. You notice in a few scenes they do emulate the perspective of a video game, following closely behind Lara as she shoots and runs and ducks from cover. The 3D is not terrible. Same as a lot of more recent 3D movies, nice touch for standard shots, well composed rooms etc, adding depth. Not the cleanest thing, definitely had some stereotypical video game cutaway shots but of course it did. Sound wasn't anything to write home about, was alright, nice to have some actual songs and not just a score. 


As I said Vikander was great, the younger verisons of Lara aren't quite as good but they each don the french plait in tribute to how we see Croft in most cases. No spoilers but there's a particular scene of her in the rain where she has a fight with someone on the island that is great. Her reaction shows how far she's come from the start of the film and not just how she's changed but that she's surprised by the change as well. It was handled well. Daniel Wu looks great as Lu Ren, drunk captain that helps Lara on and off the island in Japan. I'd keep an eye out for him, he's fun to watch, it would be great to see what he could do with a role that had a more realistically fleshed out arc. For the most part that was the issue, how real some things were, most of which you have to leave at the door anyway because it's fictional, so come on. There isn't too much disbelief. Walton Goggins is a somewhat believable villain who, to be honest, has an interesting enough story to tell alone. We don't see how his character comes to be we just get the end result which is a bit of a shame but isn't necessary for the film so understandable. 


The mystery aspect to it was fun, it's easy to forget that that is how games work, it's a giant puzzle with puzzles in the middle. It's been a while since I've watched something similar, especially with a strong female lead. To be fair the film does well to leave most of the iconic imagery from the previous films alone. And the times we do see what we're used to is at the end of the film, which makes perfect sense, let's us get to know this Croft without the pretense first then hit those I guess satisfying points. Ends with the assumption for a second and potentially third installment though I'm not sure whether these would follow the game cannon or manage to justify it's own original work. 

If you a fan you're already gonna watch it, if you're on the fence I'd definitely try it. Is it long, yes. Does it completely redeem video game adaptations? No, not quite, but it's definitely a step in the right direction.  6/10 

CINEMATES - A 

Tuesday, 10 October 2017

Flatliners (2017)



Flatliners is the story of 5 medical students, who all take part in an experiment, to find out what happens to us in the afterlife, or if there is even such a thing. To do this, they take it in turns to stop their hearts for long enough to have their own experiences, but come back and tell their stories. However, this isn’t as simple as they might have imagined when their ‘sins’ come back with them and start wreaking havoc in their everyday lives. Resulting in serious complications for some of them. This idea to me was still quite refreshing, and the aspect of supernatural beings and life experiences being brought into this is what really hooked me in, well… and Ellen Page… and the 4% Rotten Tomatoes rating (oh and I love giving remakes a go).

As I mentioned, the cast was mostly what hooked me in with this remake, Ellen Page is a gem, and I was excited to see her in this because she takes on different characters and plays them well. This role for her, was no exception. You did understand the determination possessed by Page’s character from the beginning, and by the end you genuinely did fear for her, and in some parts empathise with what she was having to deal with as a consequence of her experiment. This hooked me when the film began. This part of the story was complimented wonderfully by Diego Luna’s character, who was concerned about what was going on because it was such a stupid thing to do, and frequently raised the incredibly real point that getting into a good medical school, and training to be a doctor is hard, don’t ruin all your hard work. Oh and, living is great, why are you all essentially committing suicide?








I don’t want to focus on the fact that this is a remake too much, so I don’t want to say the reason this film got bad is due to the choice of cast, the cast weren’t bad, it’s just the performances aren’t exactly memorable, but I guess this is possibly due to the writing. This was extremely poor in some areas, and I got a few eye-rolls in. The story was reasonably strong up until the point of shoving 2 new romances into an already busy film, it wasn’t needed, and took away some of the potential for originality. Similarly, the end is basically given away at the start. You are made aware of what is going to haunt Ellen Page’s character within the first 3 minutes, which again got a massive eye-roll.


There is really nothing much to say about it, and this seems to be the general consensus from those that have seen it. It was fine, it was well made from the point of view that it encorporated some comedy, some drama, it was a thriller, and possibly could be at a huge push a horror, and I would recommend that it is something you watch if you have either seen the original, and want to laugh at the attempt to make another average film from an already reasonably average film, or if you just want to see it, because it wasn’t bad, it just wasn’t great. I mean, I would watch it again, just maybe don’t get too excited about it.

5.5/10