A Star is Born (2018)

Everyone gets attached to a particular story more than others at some point. Everyone has a film that touches them more than they could ever expect and they leave the screening completely blown away, instantly looking for a way to watch it again ASAP.

I'm 23, bisexual, i love Gaga more than I love myself. I have a longstanding, secondhand perspective of the shit storm that can be created by drug and alcohol addictions. If it's got a queen in it, I'll watch it (even if it's only 10 minutes of Willam). So, for me - A Star is Born is that film.


That was a mouthful, right? But my point is, this film got me. I knew it could have a massive impact on me, but I didn’t think it actually would, especially not in the way it has.


A Star is Born, directed by and starring Bradley Cooper, and co-starring Lady Gaga is the story of Jackson Maine (Cooper) a famous country singer with attachment issues, a severe drug and alcohol addiction who is only certain of which spirit he is going to drink that night, and that his brother Bobby (Sam Elliott) is going to be there to clean up his mess.

He bumps into Ally (Lady Gaga), a small time singer and waitress who has always been told she isn’t enough, is too ugly, and doesn’t have the voice and so begins their bloody adorable, enticing, hectic, exciting, beautiful, horrendous, romantic adventure.


The story itself is enough, it’s a beautiful story and for a sucker like me, it’s perfect. It felt real, I mean obviously not all of us are mad talented and bump into famous, delicious looking men that want to whisk us away and get our career going, but it showed how difficult things can be, and if you want them bad enough, and if someone believes in you enough you’re going to be able to do it. One of the best things really, was the fact that crucial parts of the story are hidden from the trailers, there are a couple of things I didn’t think were going to happen so they were nice (maybe not the best word when you know what they are, but you get my point) additions when I actually watched it.

The writing is simple, but effective. There are some twists and turns in this, some events that do not pan out how you’d expect, but the simplicity of how they are presented is what makes them phenomenal. This is compliment to the acting and editing really, it shows that a hefty script isn’t always needed, sometimes the talent that is there can be enough.

The casting for A Star is Born is spectacular. I can’t explain enough how perfectly chosen each person was.
Gaga gave me chills, she exceeded every expectation I had before going into this screening. I knew I was PUUUUMPED before the film even came out, but that is simply because I felt proud to see her face for this movie on a billboard, and because I love her so much whatever she does. This is the same for Bradley Cooper, he is such a badass (dish), and I was buzzing that this was his directorial debut, I was ready to see what he had to offer and he didn’t disappoint.

As soon as the film started I had extreme goosebumps, the dedication from Cooper to make this a masterpiece is insane. Knowing the months of rehearsal and coaching he went through to make his vision come to life shows that he actually gives a shit about what he is putting out there to a massive audience. His performance was stellar. As I said above I know the shit that can come alongside alcohol addiction, and he did the role justice. It even brings tears to my eyes now writing this, just remembering parts of his performance that resonated with my life so well. I felt his happiness, his excitement, his genuine love for Ally, and I understood his escape through music. Credit where credit is fucking due. This felt like a different role for him, but one he should be proud of.



Where do I begin with Gaga... she wasn’t acting, she was her character. You can see that she put so much from her personal experiences into this role. She knew the story, she knew the meaning, she became her character as soon as the cameras were rolling, and it shows. I cannot see a more perfect person cast for the role of Ally. I just forgot it was Gaga, someone that has the power to make you forget that are someone other than the character they are playing has a talent that deserves to be talked about. As well as that, her voice is unbelievable, anyone that denies that is lying - whether you are a fan or not, you can’t deny that talent. Even down to her writing for the film, just an absolutely beautiful, perfect performance.

Both performances from Cooper and Gaga were genuine, and my god were they memorable.

So, the score... I have heard it in my head since the second I left the screening. It was so powerful, it complimented the script and the whole story so well. The whole score was so pure, and different and just helped to tell the story better than I could have expected. The story of these two characters wouldn’t have evolved so well without such powerful writing, and flawless musical performances.

Visually, I think it was great. They were lucky really that they were in pretty places. You can’t say a sunny landscape on a motorbike is unattractive, that Gaga and Cooper kissing is unattractive, that a drag bar is boring, that a montage of different stages, and set ups are boring, it was great to look at.

I know i’m not the person anyone should trust when it comes to films - I mean my film of the year for 2017 was The Disaster Artist... my opinion is just one, but this film is my film of the year. It’s only September as i’m writing this but A Star is Born is it for me. 



This is a must-see film, if you disagree with this that is okay... but for me, this film is spectacular. It is fuelled by excellent chemistry, and is a moving and exhilarating story

I’m sure there are flaws, but when you find a film with an average story that is made into something incredibly above average, it it flawless. I haven’t had this feeling about a film for a while, and i’m so happy this film was the one to bring it back for me.

What we thinking, I’ll watch this 5 times on the big screen and wait a week to pre-order this??

Congrats Bradley Cooper, it was the success you’d hoped.


8.5/10

CINEMATES - S






Sent from my iPhone

Whitney (2018)

I find it surprising that people on earth still have never heard of Whitney Houston, but are old enough to buy alcohol and are supposedly responsible enough to drive a car… what is that about?

Since her death in 2012 there have been a handful of documentaries and different accounts popping up all attempting to tell Whitney’s story, but to be honest none of them have done anything for me. They either make her life seem ‘meh’, or present her as an awful drug addict.

 I love Whitney a hell of a lot, so for me badly made documentaries don’t change my opinion of her, but for those that are either not familiar with her, her life or work they don’t seem to make the best impression. 

Kevin MacDonald also has a go a this, and does her life and body of work some justice and attempts to make the world realise that you can never stop learning about someone’s life even if the film industry appears to have rinsed anyone and everyone of all the information they have.

This film hooked me in right from the beginning because of how much detail was paid to the editing. Throughout the film we are given a bit of an idea what era we are in by there being a montage almost of Whitney’s most popular music at that time mushed in with a series of flickering political events. It was such a perfect contrast and made you really think about the great escape Whitney created for her fans. 

The film then works chronologically and doesn’t just go from baby, to star, to dead star like other portrayals seem to have done before this. We get an idea of what her childhood was like, then we grow up with her, so to speak – throughout this film. Cissy Houston (Whitney’s mother) doesn’t seem to be someone you see being interviewed a lot, (well at least I don’t think I have and I have gone to some deep, dark corners of the internet when it comes to Whitney) but hearing her side of things really brought such a personal element to this film and tied things together as best as could be done for this type of production. We also heard accounts from other family members such as Whitney’s brothers – Gary and Michael, her sister in law – Pat, and close friends. As well as this we get a brief appearance from ex-husband, rapper, Bobbi Brown.

There are some parts of this film that just created goose bumps all over my body. For starters, the sound is fantastic – that’s a given, it’s Whitney Houston. Second, in some of the accounts from her family members you learn much more about her drug habit and how this began, and progressed – well at least I did. And finally, you get to the time surrounding her death which just gets me personally every time.

It really is a touching, heart-warming, upsetting, brave, considerate, and respectful piece of film.

Whether you are a Whitney fan or not, you should give this a go – I mean I took a friend who half forgot that she had died and they enjoyed it, so if that’s not giving credit I don’t know what is.

6.5/10

CINEMATES - S

Breaking In (2018)

Smart home, invasion. Gabrielle Union stays in her deceased father's home with her two children when a group of criminals break in to steal what's in her fathers safe. They only learn upon arrival how smart the house is. 

Seeing the trailer I thought this was just going to be a fun actiony thriller thing. And I was right. The children get trapped inside with the criminals whilst mama Union tries to finds her way in. So the house is kitted out. When we arrive the son finds all the surveillance, every room, every door, motion activated sensors, control panel to watch and cover that and lighting and speakers. Oh and a drone, cos why not. If this was ten years ago it might have been seen as a little stretch but now you accept it easy. And you accept how easy it is to control. 

When the family first arrive Union's character Shaun notices a few out of place things, things we find are due to the fact there had been people in the house. Pairing that with the fact it's the house she grew up in mixed with a little desperation her quick wit seems pretty believing. The four intruders were done reasonably well though one was a little excessive. The ring leader, Eddie, played by Billy Burke, means business and respects Shaun somewhat. Though underestimating her he isn't entirely surprised by her progress and successes. One of the intruders isn't really given a character but the other two work well off each other. One is s murderous and impulsive and the other already regret the decision when the kids are involved. They rock back and forth, pushing each other closer and further from redemption. We see the daughter pick up traits from her mother and help her and her brother survive. We're not given a great deal of intro other than that and that's all we need. 

The action was decent and well thought out. Stayed interesting throughout and kept tensions high during quite a few scenes. Didn't fall victim to 'she should have gone that way' or 'why didn't she do that'. Partly because the whole situation is on a time limit, The security company call 911 if systems aren't back online after the mains were cut. And partly because she's just smarter than the audience. And I'm okay with that. There were a few parts where she seemed to be able to take more hits than I would have expected a human to handle and still stand afterwards. And it definitely reminded me that hollywood mums are just fitter than real life mums, because how many other 45 year olds can fight strangers and climb onto roofs? 

The script was alright though some of the dialogue was a bit lacking. By some I mean most, most of the interesting parts of the film involved silence and action. Yes it did lean on the mama bear protecting cubs thing, which wasn't as annoying as it could have been, but was still pretty cliche in doing so. Though Union and Burke were great a cast can only go so far with what they're given. 

Had surprisingly smart scenes, would watch again/would have in the background. Just slightly more original than the standard home invasion but not by a great deal. Passable but not an urgent watch 5/10

CINEMATES - A

The Strangers: Prey at Night (2018)

Yet another preview screening from Odeon here in the UK. This Scream Unseen was The Strangers: Prey at Night. I was not impressed with this being the surprise film as I was not looking forward to it. I thought this seemed like an unnecessary sequel to what was the somewhat well received 2008 film The Strangers. It's the same story, this time it's a family of four in a trailer park that get attack in the same knifey way.

The appeal of the first film, which this one followed to begin with, was how real it could be. That it's literally just people, strangers, that pick on other strangers to kill. There was the odd highly strung moment. Many moments where it made you think, what would I do, where would I go. The characters of course made the wrong decisions but at least it becomes engaging. 

The film takes place pretty much in real time in one night in this deserted trailer park so it's dark and just surrounded by darkness. And the cinematography is dark for the most part. There was a particular scene and shot in particular that was quite interesting in a swimming pool. I won't spoil it but it's well lit and colourful and unlike the beginning of the film. It was immersive in the midst of the action regardless whether the action is satisfying or not, that's up to you. This scene also has music blaring from speakers, 80's music, which we hear multiple times straight from the film as the killers enjoy it. some of which was fun, was unsettling, music to violence can make you feel some kind of way and it did. Until it was a hugely popular track which just takes you out of the film and the moment. 

The cast were alright. I'm a fan of Christina Hendricks, she was fine. Dad played by Martin Henderson was also fine. Brother and sister Lewis Pullman and Bailee Madison were okay. They has some awkward sibling back and forth which wasn't so much them as it was the script. Some of the dialogue was weak. They had set up a backstory for the daughter that seemed pointless. Didn't give quite enough to warrant it connecting to her character or make any part of her behaviour justifiable. Followed by no explanation it was honestly unnecessary, didn't add as they didn't commit to it. 

I touched on scenes leading you to different directions and characters choosing the wrong way. Now I'm fine with some silliness, I am happy to indulge that. But this film didn't want to be silly until it was too late. By then we've already been lulled into a horror that's attempting to be taken seriously. The less than subtle dive into unbelievable nonsense is a joke. It felt like something I'd watch age 12 at a sleepover. Which I would have been more open to it they had committed to that from the start. Doing this they managed to miss out on a chilling horror and a guilty pleasure by awkwardly dipping their toes in each instead of jumping into one. 

The best way to describe the film is disposable. It's a one view only type of thing that you will forget about. In the first film when asked why they were doing this they replied, 'Because you were home. ' THAT was what this film needed. More chilling, less nonsense, not as powerful as it should have been. 5/10


CINEMATES - A 

Love, Simon (2018)

Here we go, another novel adapted to a screenplay… and for once I’m sure this wasn’t a mistake.

Simon Spier (Nick Robinson) lives a normal life, as he tells us right at the start of this film. He has a happy home life, with his mum (Jennifer Garner), his dad (Josh Duhamel) and his sister Nora (Talitha Bateman). He has a great group of friends, who he has been friends with for years Nick, and Leah, and his new found friend Abby (Jorge Lendeborg Jr., Katherine Lagford, and Alexandra Shipp) and is the guy everyone likes, generally. However, he has a secret that he has been keeping from all of these people, and the rest of the world – he’s gay.

He connects with someone online, because of a reveal on their school blog, type website, and finally he can open up to someone and he feels a that a burden has been lifted, and for the first time, is allowed to feel what he wants to despite keeping the truth bottled up. Another person finds out about his emails to his ‘pen-pal’, Blue – and all hell breaks loose. He has to choose between what is right, and what is easy whilst putting all of these brilliant relationships, and his perfect life on the line.

First things first, I think the producer for this film was a solid match. As someone who is openly gay, Greg Berlanti had this. There was such a personal element that was felt throughout this film, it was really just spot on. I mean, I am not gay, but it was almost like films about people who loose family members to cnacer, you can relate on some level. Anything involving how much respect is deserved by those within the LGBTQ+ community is something I live for. That is a community I comfortably assosciate myself as a part of, and this film - in particular how Simon dealt with everything about his situation filled me with masses of warmth.

The emphasis on this should definitely be how his support networks were written in to this. Don’t get me wrong, like always, this is an over perfect, ideal kind of result. What are the chances of things ever panning out this way? But come on, it’s fictional, and it got shit for a little while for Simon, because we’re humans and we all mess up because we are a selfish species… But then we manage to bring it back in after some wallowing and consistent apologising. 

This film really focused on how awful things can be, and how imperfect romance really is, and that’s what I liked about it. Oh, I’m also a sucker for a happy ending.

The cast were responsible for SO MUCH SUCCESS IN THIS. What an absolute gem Nick Robinson is. His performance was fantastically multi-layered and ticked all of the boxes. He was able to turn on his charm when needed, demonstrate that Simon needed to hide his emotions at times, was able to be funny and easy going, and when it came down to it really go for it and pull on the old heartstrings of the audience. I felt connected with Simon, and his group of friends. Such moving performances from such generally young cast. Credit, where credit is due.  

The editing in this was perfect. It was well paced, it was upbeat, and it adjusted to what was going on where it needed to in the story. The script was spot on, we got a sweet dose of knowledge every now and then, and really got to know everyone enough that the film wasn’t filled with pure fluff, but didn’t leave you lost expecting more.

The score was brilliantly selected, suiting so many different moods, and genuinely kept me smiling, and again helped with the pacing, and with helping you feel connected to the characters we were learning about and watching.

This film was about a young boy coming out as gay, but it was also about the struggles of being a teenager. This was a decent ‘coming of age’ rom-com. Any topical humour that was thrown in, was not offensive, it was funny. It didn’t change my opinion on any one person, or group of people. It didn’t make me cringe, it wasn’t a bunch of kids being badly portrayed, it felt real. The level of thought put into this production is what made it a success. The obvious chunks of personality, and personal experience and feeling that have clearly gone into its creation have made it one of my favourite films of 2018, so far.



Definitely a must-see. Like I said, I’m not gay, but its inoffensive, heart-warming and SO worth the watch. I’m ready to see this again.

7.5/10

CINEMATES - S

The Greatest Showman (2017)

Let me preface this baby with the fact that I love musicals. I bloody love a good musical. When I heard our Hugh Jackman was gonna be singing and dancing, I was in. When I heard Zac Efron was doing the same, I was so in. Beautiful men singing and dancing? OKAY. It's the story of PT Barnum, played by Jackman, a showman, politician and businessman but for this film, creator of the circus. 

Now you have to give into the theatrics a little as expected, it's a circus, it's the in 1800's and not entirely awful, so they obviously glaze over some things. We follow Barnum as a poor child, working hard to get any money he can, in love with the daughter of a very wealthy family. They grow closer, have children and he wants to give her everything she had before and lies his way into a loan for a museum that turns to a circus. 

Jackman starts out open minded and amazed at whoever turns up to his flyer for unique people, then exaggerates their features. Makes the tall man taller, the fat man fatter etc. We meet some great characters, follow Barnum around as he finds different people, he appears earnest to meet them and have them on his team but it has a fine line of just wanting to catch the biggest fish to get the trophy. His seemingly opened mindedness to these differences become fueled by fame and money as opposed to curiosity and wellbeing. Something that is shown quite well through Jackman though the writing was a bit shaky on the development.

As I mentioned we don't see that many bad things considering the time and the topics. Subtly mention the difficulties that Zendaya and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II characters face, being a black brother and sister in mid 19th century. Didn't go into the real difficulties because its a PG musical but I have a feeling that a lot of young kids will watch and not understand why Zefron didn't want to hold pretty little Zendaya's hand in front of people. We also ignored how they got (CGI) elephants and how they would have been trained/mistreated in the circus. 

But that's expected! It's a fun showstopping musical. It has already gain three nominations for the 75th Golden Globes, Best Motion Picture Musical or Comedy, Best Actor - Comedy or Musical and Best Original Song. I was happy as soon as it started, though apparently I'm a sucker for large groups of people stamping their feet to music at the same time. The songs were great, well done and wonderfully choreographed. The costumes were fascinating, the set pieces large and bold. The use of CGI was noticeable but it felt somewhat forgivable due to the nature of the film being a little bit extraordinary. 

The cast hold themselves well enough considering there's so many faces it's hard to give anyone a personality outside of 'bearded woman'. Jackman was good, his wife Charity Barnum, played by Michelle Williams came across genuine with their children. Zac Efron was great musically as he can sing and dance, though I think he's a semi decent actor this character didn't quite have the development or depth for him to show off. Zendaya did well in only her second feature length, Spiderman Homecoming (2017) being the first. Rebecca Ferguson plays a famous opera singer with a high level a grace that feels almost misplaced with the story even though it really happened. 

I watched this film 7 days ago and I still have the songs in my head. A tad bit empty but a lot of fun. Wouldn't stand on it's own as a drama, the music holds this feature, don't think too hard, it's feel good. 6/10, 7 if you fancy Hugh Jackman and Zac Efron or if you're big on musicals.

CINEMATES - A

The Disaster Artist - video review!

THE DISASTER ARTIST

Suburbicon (2017)

I honestly don’t know where this review is going to go, because I am just so confused. You know when you head into a film screening, having read the synopsis beforehand… but come out even more curious and clueless that you were to begin with? Suburbicon is one of those films.

Before going in, I was sure this was a film – BASED ON WHAT THE INTERNET DESCRIPTIONS SAID, about a family who had to deal with a lot, due to difficulties arising in Suburbicon, and Matt Damon played a ‘Liam Neeson in Taken-esque’, super-dad that kicked ass. I HAVE NEVER BEEN MORE WRONG.

I honestly can’t say that this was a bad surprise though, because I can’t think of a film that I have experienced, which is anything like this. I’m going to try and keep this review as generic as possible because of the fact that the synopsis seems to do the same (This film can be spoiled in a second, so I am going to attempt to skip detail where I can).

Suburbicon is the story of an all-white American town/community living situation, in which everything is very calm, and running like clockwork. Nothing bad happens in Suburbicon. Everyone lives in perfect little houses, with a white picket fence, a back porch, a decent sized garden - you get the drift. Then suddenly, things begin to go downhill in the town, and the Lodge family are the ones that are suffering because of this.

The thing that I took away from this film was the awfully random, ill-fitting, unexplained part of the story involving a black American family moving into the town. It was a story about a town of racists in parts. I understand that due to the era this film was meant to be set in, and it being an all-white living area, it makes sense that the event of a black family moving in, will cause conflict. Yes, you can assume that the reason the horrific events that occur, supposedly (from the point of view of the citizens) occurs as a direct result of 3 black people suddenly moving in to the area. But this is just such a disjointed part of the plot, and honestly brings nothing to the story whatsoever, and in fact just confused the plot. As well as it confusing the story, it’s just such a bad depiction of such an event. We have tonnes of films incorporated this theme, and doing something creative with it. The creativity that seemed to be attempted was a giant flop.

The story itself, obviously ignoring this part was gripping. I liked the theme that was chosen, I like how dark it was, and I liked the (possibly) unintentional comedy. Matt Damon plays an awkward Psycho, and his performance surprised me, as it was one that I enjoyed. 

The progression of the story was quick, which was both good and bad. It was good, because it meant it was well paced, overall. I didn’t feel like the film was too long, or too short. It certainly lacked detail, but it was still fine to watch. The setting, at the start of the film, reminded me of the beginning of Edward Scissorhands, so at that point made me feel a bit worried, because that setting can be used badly. In this case, I think it was used well, and it complimented the story… Especially as I thought I was going in to see a TOTALLY different film. But it gradually started to impress me.

The greatest fault that this film has, besides the story, is the script. The script in this film was boring. It was not ‘meaty’, for lack of a better word. I would have written this film off had it not been for the cast, who - on the whole, did the job. This was also the case for the score. Although the score is DEFINITELY not noteworthy, there was one, and it worked with what we were seeing on screen.

Suburbicon is a film that starts off incredibly slowly, and then increasingly becomes more tense, more gritty, and more worth the watch.

5.5/10

CINEMATES - S 

Flatliners (2017)

Flatliners is the story of 5 medical students, who all take part in an experiment, to find out what happens to us in the afterlife, or if there is even such a thing. To do this, they take it in turns to stop their hearts for long enough to have their own experiences, but come back and tell their stories. However, this isn’t as simple as they might have imagined when their ‘sins’ come back with them and start wreaking havoc in their everyday lives. Resulting in serious complications for some of them. This idea to me was still quite refreshing, and the aspect of supernatural beings and life experiences being brought into this is what really hooked me in, well… and Ellen Page… and the 4% Rotten Tomatoes rating (oh and I love giving remakes a go).

As I mentioned, the cast was mostly what hooked me in with this remake, Ellen Page is a gem, and I was excited to see her in this because she takes on different characters and plays them well. This role for her, was no exception. You did understand the determination possessed by Page’s character from the beginning, and by the end you genuinely did fear for her, and in some parts empathise with what she was having to deal with as a consequence of her experiment. This hooked me when the film began. This part of the story was complimented wonderfully by Diego Luna’s character, who was concerned about what was going on because it was such a stupid thing to do, and frequently raised the incredibly real point that getting into a good medical school, and training to be a doctor is hard, don’t ruin all your hard work. Oh and, living is great, why are you all essentially committing suicide?

I don’t want to focus on the fact that this is a remake too much, so I don’t want to say the reason this film got bad is due to the choice of cast, the cast weren’t bad, it’s just the performances aren’t exactly memorable, but I guess this is possibly due to the writing. This was extremely poor in some areas, and I got a few eye-rolls in. The story was reasonably strong up until the point of shoving 2 new romances into an already busy film, it wasn’t needed, and took away some of the potential for originality. Similarly, the end is basically given away at the start. You are made aware of what is going to haunt Ellen Page’s character within the first 3 minutes, which again got a massive eye-roll.

There is really nothing much to say about it, and this seems to be the general consensus from those that have seen it. It was fine, it was well made from the point of view that it encorporated some comedy, some drama, it was a thriller, and possibly could be at a huge push a horror, and I would recommend that it is something you watch if you have either seen the original, and want to laugh at the attempt to make another average film from an already reasonably average film, or if you just want to see it, because it wasn’t bad, it just wasn’t great. I mean, I would watch it again, just maybe don’t get too excited about it.

5.5/10

It (2017)

I don't even know where to begin. Bloody brilliant. It was overwhelming even with the huge reception it was given. For those who don't know much on the story, the quiet town of Derry has a mysterious thing, It, that comes out every 27 years to feed on children. The Stephen King novel takes place both in the 80s and 27 years later so we see the story from the character's perspective as both kids and adults. This film, unlike the 1990's mini series, just covers the children's side over the course of a year. 

So It is a horror movie, now is it scary? Yes, yes it is and I am so happy to say that. The creature takes the form of whatever you fear the most, for the most part it's Pennywise the iconic clown played by Bill Skarsgård. The film plays on so many fears and phobias that no one is safe. It's fun. There's multiple jumps but never cheap ones. You're constantly tense and on edge. The suspense was incredible, every other scene was a build up to something else, there was a constant level of foreboding at every corner. For me that happened almost instantly, if you know anything about the story, little Georgie in his raincoat with his paper boat makes you uneasy to think about. No spoilers but there's a scene where Pennywise chases someone up the stairs and I got that same feeling I did as a kid when I'd run up the stairs in the dark because I thought something was gonna snap at my ankles. The scares you were bracing yourself for were great, the surprise ones were great too. 

Lets talk Pennywise. Skarsgård kills it, young guy with a mixture of things under his belt is definitely gonna be a common name after this. His Pennywise starts childish and inoffensive yet creepy and builds to being completely menacing. His look constantly makes you uneasy, he drools talking to the children he wants to eat. His eyes drift in and out of focus and often in different directions. His movements are fantastically intertwined with visual effects and camera work. He runs with speed and aggression and the camera shudders in response. His body moves unworldly, twists and revolts and transforms at will. Absolutely fascinating to watch. Unless you're scared of clowns you'll find that every second he's on screen you can't help but stare at every inch of him. Incredible. Calling it now, number one Halloween costume 2018.

Let's get it out the way the kids are all adorable. Finn Wolfhard we already know and love from Netflix Stranger Things (2016), huge career ahead of him. Naturally funny as Richie, definitely showed the friendship with the others. Jack Dylan Grazer is cute as a goddamn button as Eddie Kaspbrak, forced hypochondriac by his mother. I noticed him in the trailer as appearing genuinely terrified and that shook me up. He's brilliant. Jaeden Lieberher plays our stuttering main man Bill Denbrough and he hits the balance of fear and sadness and shines bravery through them both. Jeremy Ray Taylor is endearing as ever as new kid Ben, who fits seamlessly into the Losers Club. And Chosen Jacobs does well, he has a brief sentimental moment about his family where he gets to stretch his sad muscles amongst the fear and kills it. Wyatt Oleff is great as Stanley showing his struggles more than the rest of the group, which if you've read the book is heartbreaking to see. And Sophia Lillis, was perfect. I watched her as if I recognised her because she just looked exactly how I imagined her to be. She was gorgeous and cool as the 80's girl next door. Showed genuine fear and independence in turn of that, definitely one to watch.

The rest of the cast were great. Though there are no real adults. Very few lines of dialogue from authority, parents and otherwise, and they're all a little off. It is very much a film about the kids and they smash it. 

Cinematography is great right off the bat. Also, major points for this, doesn't get too dark. It's in the sewers yet we can see everything! Amazing! No chickening out here, they show you everything, you don't miss a thing unless you close your eyes. Which is great, no cop outs. Editing is great too, there's some great comedic moments which land well because of the editing. For me the stand out performance is the sound. Absolutely incredible. I saw this in Imax and I'm so pleased I did. They use a familiar heavy bass that you feel creeping up and harsh silences that make you hold your breath. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if there's an Oscar nod in that department, or for costume and make up either for that matter. 

Well rounded horror, Mama (2013) director Andy Muschietti proves he knows what he's doing. One of the best films of the year. You're doing yourself a disservice if you don't watch this in the cinema 8.5/10

CINEMATES - A

Detroit (2017)

I didn't know a great deal about the story going into this, I was aware it was one of the many recent stains in American history where African Americans are brutally treated by authority and justice has failed them. It's odd that as I write that I could be talking about basically any big unjust shooting in the last couple years but this was 50 years ago in 1967 amongst the Detroit Rebellion. The film focuses on police pushing boundaries and interrogating a group of people in Algiers Motel for a confession that ultimately leads to murder. It's based on real people and actual court cases but due to some missing information and of course the fact none of us were actually there, they fabricated some of the story. 

The reason I was so interested in this was to see John Boyega tackle such a heavy story, to see how he took responsibility to play a real person with important themes. I think he was the best thing about the film. He's mainly level headed and calm but doesn't under react. He appears to be exactly as he is, a random honest man caught in a bad situation trying his best to keep people safe, even when he knows things are against him. Saying that I thought there would be more of him, there's an odd character progression with him where his performance peaks in the last moments we see him on screen.

The rest of the cast was okay. It was more of an ensemble piece than I expected. Antagonist 'punchable face' / Will Poulter was okay, he had some genuine moments regards to the character flat out lying to people and he appeared to be a bad liar. What that tells you about the skill of the actor I don't know. But his accent is great and as I've 100% mentioned before I love a British actor smashing American films. He wasn't likable but he wasn't meant to be. Anthony Mackie was great to watch too, it's nice to him in this type of role no matter how small. 

Understandably very little character development as the story takes place over such a short time. And the story in question relies on the lack of information, the whole point is that we don't exactly know. The antagonists rely on assumptions of other characters and creating the characters to be what they needed to fit their own story, their alibi. 

Katherine Bigelow uses similar techniques as she did with Oscar winning The Hurt Locker (2008) filming one scene with multiple cameras in different places. Capturing the same piece from multiple angles, giving the actors the flexibility to move around and not be confined. Which I believe helps let the characters breath a little. She seems to know strengths of war or humanising it, alongside the handheld shots it helped make people appear quite raw. But this was not quite Academy Award winning. The sound did the same, was very real. Some of the characters were in a Motown band and sung at different points of the film. Hearing a sole voice singing with no backing track and no other sound in the scene is quite powerful. The sound makes sure you notice. 

Though it may appear as Oscar bait it's not quite worthy. It was a 15 minutes intro, followed by a 2 hour scene, a 10 minute 'finale' and some classic real life photos with facts written over them. I understand the choice of narrative structure but I think it's difficult. I understand that it's in place not to break things up, it's to make sure you endure the awful interrogation with the characters. But 2 and a half hours is a long time, let alone for such a topic. But even that, I don't think it had the weight to match the duration.

Good yes, but not as timeless as it could have been 6/10

CINEMATES - A 

Wish Upon (2017)

Okay so you're either gonna be in this demographic or you're not. I definitely am. By that I don't mean the probable target for the film, I mean people that enjoy bad horrors. I like a silly horror movie, I like horror cliches, I like American high school cliches, I'll take it all. I don't discriminate, I enjoy horrors of all qualities. Wish Upon hits that up. A teenage girl finds a magical box that grants wishes but everything comes with a price.


Joey King plays protagonist Clare Shannon, who's dumpster diving dad, who I will wholeheartedly discuss in a moment, finds a box covered in ancient Chinese writing. He gifts it to her as an early birthday present to which she says, sure I'll make a wish, what's the worse that can happen? Death is the answer to that. Somewhat interesting concept for a modern horror, which was enough to pique my interest. I figured even if it wasn't very good she's still gotta wish and the box still has to mess things up so even if it's bad, stuff is going on. 

It's pretty funny, the best friend characters almost get a few chuckles in and same with the mean clique but most of the jokes come from the cliches and not from them trying to be funny. Some of the deaths are pretty comical, I won't ruin any but they're all pretty predictable. There's a girl fight in the high school that's also pretty funny. To the point where it almost appears as the cast think it's pretty silly too. The acting wasn't great, it didn't need to be but it wasn't great. I thought King was okay until I saw everything else she's been in and now I think with all that under her belt she should be better. Her friend Ryan Hui is played by 30 year old Ki Hong Lee, who played Dong in Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. And her dad is played by Ryan Phillippe. 

Let talk about Phillippe. I forgot how long ago Cruel Intentions was. It's long enough ago that he is old enough to play a dad now. And I'm gonna be straight with you, he's pretty dilfy. So he dumpster dives, for what exactly I don't know, just stuff of value. He wears a big jacket and a beanie and hasn't shaved in a little while. He also has a saxophone for some reason. After seeing him dumpster dive yet again Clare gets annoyed and wishes for her dad to no longer embarrass her. So he shaves. That's legit it, he shaves and plays his sax again and her friends suddenly realise he's hot because they didn't know him in 1997. This is one of the silly wishes. It feels more like there was an idea for a death and so they thought up a mediocre wish to justify it. The box specifies 7 wishes, which let's be real, is about 4 too many. 

It was well rounded enough, hinted at things at the beginning, became full circle. Script was alright but a little messy, writer Barbara Marshall hasn't written many features. The director John R. Leonetti has an odd mix of works behind him, having director, cinematographer and camera department credits. Cinematography was whatever, nothing in particular, had a few classic horror shots, edited in an over zealous manner to some standard horror music. Pretty average as far as that goes.

It's not a great movie, but interesting enough. I had a lot of fun watching this and I know I will watch it again. It's like one of those films you see on Netlflix and say, sure I've got a time to spare, I'll try it. Again, if you're a fan of silly horrors, this will be right up your alley, if not, you probably won't find many merits. 

A high five out of ten if you will. If you're looking for the next classic horror to chill you to the bone, this is not it. But honestly, it's a good laugh with friends, just a reminder that a movie doesn't have to be good to enjoy it. 5/10

CINEMATES  - A

Baby Driver (2017)

Spectacular. What a film should be. So our own Edgar Wright wrote and directed this original film about Baby, a young getaway driver trying to get out of the game with one last heist. Well written, well directed, well done Ed.

The cast was spectacular, and I'll openly admit that I'm bias for half of them. Ansel Elgort is perfect for Baby. I really enjoyed how much of the character is left for the film and isn't included in the trailer. We get to know him as a person and his life growing up gradually, as we should. He has a long time relationship with Kevin Spacey who plays Doc, the big man in charge. I think Kevin Spacey is hypnotising, he was in Se7en (1995), he was in A Bug's Life (1998) and this is no different. Jamie Foxx actually used to sit in and watch Spacey even when he didn't need to be on set, just to take in what he was doing. Very impressive man, but not to talk down Academy Awarding winning Foxx and his character Bats. Who is fun and threatening though in parts cliched, the character is still original to watch. I enjoy Jon Hamm in everything he does, check him out in 30 Rock and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, surprisingly funny. No spoilers but his character has the chance to show a range of emotion and he does. Also thoroughly enjoyed his partner, Darling, played by Ezia Gonzalez, a young actress that can definitely hold her own against the rest of the cast. There's a considerable number of characters and reasonable depth for each of them. Remember, they all have fake names, Doc, Baby, Buddy, Darling, Bats etc, the less we know about them the more we're treated like the other characters. Criminals need anonymity. 

OKAY SOUND TIME. Incredible. That's established in the trailer and the few promo clips. We listen to the sound with Baby as he listens to one of his many iPods. The scenes and editing are cut to the sound. The gunshots, the car door slams, the coffee cups placed on the table, all to the beat of the song playing. It changes if he's listening to one or both ear buds. As he has tinnitus if he's not listening to music there's a low ringing in the background, we're very much in his shoes and I love it. The editing really does highlight this and I'd be honestly shocked if there was no Oscar nod for sound mixing or sound editing. The music was an insightful selection for not only the scene but for the character. The opening sequence and what follows, establishes the theme of the film and then the character. We see Baby interact with the gang, his deaf foster father, his love interest Debora, and his parents, all with music. He uses it to connect with his past and communicate the present with his foster father Joseph. He uses it build up a barrier with the gang and to break it down with Debora. There's no secrets, it's all diegetic sound, we are there, we are included. 

The editing as I said is cut beautifully to the music, it crossed my mind that the editors must have had a great time putting this together. Both Paul Machliss and Jonothan Amos have been editors for many big British shows and have worked together before, as well as with Edgar Wright and it shows. There is a particular scene there the timing of the cut with the sound is reminiscent of a montage of Shaun leaving his house in Shaun of the Dead (2004). Just a small reminder of where this film has came from. The cinematographer, Bill Pope, has again has an impressive list of works including collaborations with Wright and the editors. Very stylistic but not distracting, going back to the opening sequence and the scene that follows, it was gorgeous and immerse. The entire film is almost interactive with the spectator. Great range of colour, great costumes, a few moments of day dreams which accentuate those aspects as well. 

It's an incredibly well rounded film. When you get an original screenplay that's what you should hope for, things said at the beginning making sense at the end. Characters having developments that we knew or that we didn't. It was really on purpose. The script was great, each character seemed like separate characters and their interactions are great. Not as funny as some of Wrights predecessors but still comedic moments. The dialogue felt fresh and natural for the most part. It had moments wherein a film references another films and it didn't feel too unwarranted or take you out of the moment. 

Couldn't think of a flaw after watching this. I read a few reviews myself to try and see a different perspective and I found one poorly written attempt at a criticism but it definitely opened my mind. There is a potential contradiction in character choices when it comes to the finale. I don't quite believe this, I believe that some character development is more subtle than others and I didn't doubt any of the decisions made by any of the characters. But let me know what you think on that front, I imagine a second viewing will do wonders either way.

Outstanding, I'm seeing it again in the cinema and I can't wait for a fancy blu ray as this film is interesting from script to screen 9/10

CINEMATES - A